Best AI Advisory Services

appliedAI

Munich AI initiative pairing a company with a non-profit institute for AI Act guidance

Founded 2017 | Munich, Germany | ~120 employees
readiness-assessmenteu-ai-actai-governanceai-traininguse-case-prioritization

What is appliedAI?

appliedAI grew out of UnternehmerTUM, the entrepreneurship center linked to the Technical University of Munich, in 2017, and has run as a joint venture with the Innovation Park Artificial Intelligence in Heilbronn since 2022. It has two parts: appliedAI Initiative GmbH, which advises and trains companies, and the non-profit appliedAI Institute for Europe, which publishes on AI regulation and how to put the AI Act into practice. Directory estimates put the company at around 120 people. German industrial firms use it for readiness, governance, and training more than for large builds.

appliedAI works primarily with clients in Manufacturing, Automotive, Energy, Financial services, Public sector sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Advice from a German AI ecosystem with a non-profit institute focused on AI Act practice.

appliedAI tech stack and services

EU AI ActGDPRISO/IEC 42001
Service area
Readiness Assessment
EU AI Act Classification
AI Governance
AI Training & Literacy
Use-Case Prioritization

appliedAI pricing

Short answer: appliedAI prices its work as follows: project and program fees; rates on request. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.

Engagement model Typical range Best for
Fixed-scope assessment Fixed fee; quoted per scope One or a few use cases, checked before any build
Multi-use-case advisory Quoted per scope Several use cases, teams, or systems
Ongoing advisory Retainer or subscription; not public Governance reviews and decisions over time
appliedAI does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.

appliedAI pros and cons

Advantages Things to consider
+No platform or large delivery business to sell, which keeps advice neutral -Focused on Germany, with less reach elsewhere
+Non-profit institute publishes practical guidance on applying the AI Act -Joint-venture structure is unusual, so ask which entity you contract with
+Training programs for staff at many levels -Not a delivery partner for large builds
+Close links to German industry and research

appliedAI vs alternatives

How appliedAI compares to the other top AI Advisory firms.

Company Best for Key difference Rating Compare
KPMG Regulated firms needing audit-grade AI governance. Governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system 4.6 Full comparison
Tensorway COOs and CFOs wanting a vendor-neutral AI plan. Two-interview method per use case, a written drop list, and a roadmap another vendor can implement 4.5 Full comparison
PwC Multinationals mapping AI Act duties with other EU... EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program 4.4 Full comparison
Deloitte Large regulated groups needing documented AI controls. Regulatory and audit teams beside the AI advisers, with global reach 4.3 Full comparison
Trilateral Research Public bodies needing rights and ethics assessments. Fundamental rights and ethics impact assessments from a research-led firm 4.3 Full comparison
EY Enterprises building AI risk into existing controls. AI risk work folded into existing technology risk and controls programs 4.2 Full comparison
DAIN Studios Nordic and DACH firms wanting governance they own. Governance and readiness work designed to be run by the client's own team 4.2 Full comparison
Artefact Large consumer brands across European markets. Data governance and AI planning with engineers in the same firm 4.2 Full comparison
Gartner CIOs and CDOs choosing AI vendors. Analyst advice on AI vendors and governance with no implementation work to sell 4.2 Full comparison
TÜV SÜD Firms wanting an independent AI Act assessment. Independent testing and certification of AI systems against EU AI Act requirements 4.1 Full comparison
BABL AI Companies needing an independent third-party AI audit. Criteria-based third-party AI audits, separate from any design or build work 4.1 Full comparison
Sia Partners Utilities and insurers wanting regulatory-minded advice. Sector regulatory practices applied to AI governance, plus its own Heka.ai tools 4.1 Full comparison
BearingPoint European banks pairing AI with regulatory reporting. European consulting with regulatory technology products from the same group 4.1 Full comparison
PA Consulting UK public bodies wanting advice plus delivery. Advice from teams that also design and build, strong in UK government 4.0 Full comparison
Zühlke Swiss and European health and finance firms. Partner-owned advisory and engineering for regulated health and finance work 4.0 Full comparison
ML6 Benelux firms wanting advice from builders. Use-case discovery from engineers who also handle EU AI Act requirements 4.0 Full comparison
Eticas Public bodies auditing deployed algorithms. Independent algorithmic audits that measure bias and accuracy in real use 4.0 Full comparison
Advai UK financial firms testing AI before launch. Technical robustness testing, chosen by the FCA as partner for its AI Live Testing pilot 3.9 Full comparison
Futurice Nordic firms redesigning services around AI. AI strategy combined with service design and operating-model work 3.9 Full comparison
Knowit Nordic public authorities wanting a local partner. Nordic public-sector reach with data governance and AI under one roof 3.9 Full comparison
Saidot Teams wanting AI inventory software with setup help. Governance software for AI inventories and risk tracking, integrated with Azure AI 3.9 Full comparison
West Monroe US COOs targeting operating-cost gains. Operations and cost-led AI advice from a partly employee-owned firm 3.8 Full comparison
Elder Research US agencies wanting a data feasibility check. Feasibility calls grounded in three decades of hands-on modeling 3.8 Full comparison
Ekimetrics CFOs who want AI tied to measured returns. Return-on-investment measurement for marketing and sustainability AI 3.8 Full comparison
Slalom North American firms wanting local consultants. Local-office consultants for AI governance and operating models 3.8 Full comparison
Thoughtworks CTOs judging build-or-buy on AI tooling. Public Technology Radar and engineering-led build-or-buy advice 3.8 Full comparison
Centric Consulting Mid-size US firms writing AI usage policies. Acceptable-use policies and staff adoption programs for generative AI 3.7 Full comparison
RTS Labs Small US firms testing one idea cheaply. The cheapest entry point here, with feasibility tests in place of strategy decks 3.7 Full comparison
Future Processing European mid-size firms on a modest budget. AI readiness checks at published Central European rates 3.7 Full comparison

appliedAI FAQ

What is appliedAI?

Munich AI initiative pairing a company with a non-profit institute for AI Act guidance

How much does appliedAI charge?

Pricing model: project and program fees; rates on request. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.

What tech stack does appliedAI use?

appliedAI works with EU AI Act, GDPR, ISO/IEC 42001. Primary industries served include Manufacturing, Automotive, Energy, Financial services, Public sector.

Is appliedAI right for enterprise?

Best for: german industrial firms seeking neutral AI guidance. Team size: ~120. Key consideration: Focused on Germany, with less reach elsewhere.

What are the best appliedAI alternatives?

The best alternatives to appliedAI depend on your use case. Top options are:

  • KPMG: governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system
  • Tensorway: two-interview method per use case, a written drop list, and a roadmap another vendor can implement
  • PwC: EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program
See full alternatives list

Compare appliedAI with other AI Advisory firms

Verify all details directly with appliedAI before making a decision.