Centric Consulting
Ohio-based remote-first consultancy helping mid-size US firms set AI usage rules
Founded 1999 | Dayton, USA | ~1,400 employees
ai-governanceai-trainingchange-managementimplementation-support
What is Centric Consulting?
Centric Consulting is a remote-first firm founded in 1999, headquartered in Dayton, Ohio, with about 1,400 people in the US and India. Its AI advice centers on acceptable-use policies for generative AI, AI centers of excellence, and staff adoption. That suits mid-size US companies that need rules and training before any big program.
Centric Consulting works primarily with clients in Insurance, Healthcare, Financial services, Manufacturing sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Acceptable-use policies and staff adoption programs for generative AI.
Centric Consulting tech stack and services
AzureMicrosoft Copilot
| Service area |
|---|
| AI Governance |
| AI Training & Literacy |
| Change Management |
| Implementation After Advice |
Centric Consulting pricing
Short answer: Centric Consulting prices its work as follows: consulting fees; rates not published. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed-scope assessment | Fixed fee; quoted per scope | One or a few use cases, checked before any build |
| Delivery team | Team rate; see pricing model above | Building what the advice recommends |
Centric Consulting does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Centric Consulting pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Practical usage policies and training | -Little EU regulatory work |
| +Sized for mid-size US companies | -Light on cost modeling |
| +Insurance and healthcare accelerators | -Mostly Microsoft-centered |
Centric Consulting vs alternatives
How Centric Consulting compares to the other top AI Advisory firms.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPMG | Regulated firms needing audit-grade AI governance. | Governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | COOs and CFOs wanting a vendor-neutral AI plan. | Two-interview method per use case, a written drop list, and a roadmap another vendor can implement | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| PwC | Multinationals mapping AI Act duties with other EU... | EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| appliedAI | German industrial firms seeking neutral AI guidance. | Advice from a German AI ecosystem with a non-profit institute focused on AI Act practice | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Deloitte | Large regulated groups needing documented AI controls. | Regulatory and audit teams beside the AI advisers, with global reach | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Trilateral Research | Public bodies needing rights and ethics assessments. | Fundamental rights and ethics impact assessments from a research-led firm | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| EY | Enterprises building AI risk into existing controls. | AI risk work folded into existing technology risk and controls programs | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| DAIN Studios | Nordic and DACH firms wanting governance they own. | Governance and readiness work designed to be run by the client's own team | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Artefact | Large consumer brands across European markets. | Data governance and AI planning with engineers in the same firm | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Gartner | CIOs and CDOs choosing AI vendors. | Analyst advice on AI vendors and governance with no implementation work to sell | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| TÜV SÜD | Firms wanting an independent AI Act assessment. | Independent testing and certification of AI systems against EU AI Act requirements | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BABL AI | Companies needing an independent third-party AI audit. | Criteria-based third-party AI audits, separate from any design or build work | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Sia Partners | Utilities and insurers wanting regulatory-minded advice. | Sector regulatory practices applied to AI governance, plus its own Heka.ai tools | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BearingPoint | European banks pairing AI with regulatory reporting. | European consulting with regulatory technology products from the same group | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| PA Consulting | UK public bodies wanting advice plus delivery. | Advice from teams that also design and build, strong in UK government | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Swiss and European health and finance firms. | Partner-owned advisory and engineering for regulated health and finance work | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| ML6 | Benelux firms wanting advice from builders. | Use-case discovery from engineers who also handle EU AI Act requirements | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Eticas | Public bodies auditing deployed algorithms. | Independent algorithmic audits that measure bias and accuracy in real use | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Advai | UK financial firms testing AI before launch. | Technical robustness testing, chosen by the FCA as partner for its AI Live Testing pilot | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Futurice | Nordic firms redesigning services around AI. | AI strategy combined with service design and operating-model work | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Knowit | Nordic public authorities wanting a local partner. | Nordic public-sector reach with data governance and AI under one roof | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Saidot | Teams wanting AI inventory software with setup help. | Governance software for AI inventories and risk tracking, integrated with Azure AI | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| West Monroe | US COOs targeting operating-cost gains. | Operations and cost-led AI advice from a partly employee-owned firm | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Elder Research | US agencies wanting a data feasibility check. | Feasibility calls grounded in three decades of hands-on modeling | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Ekimetrics | CFOs who want AI tied to measured returns. | Return-on-investment measurement for marketing and sustainability AI | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Slalom | North American firms wanting local consultants. | Local-office consultants for AI governance and operating models | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Thoughtworks | CTOs judging build-or-buy on AI tooling. | Public Technology Radar and engineering-led build-or-buy advice | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| RTS Labs | Small US firms testing one idea cheaply. | The cheapest entry point here, with feasibility tests in place of strategy decks | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Future Processing | European mid-size firms on a modest budget. | AI readiness checks at published Central European rates | 3.7 | Full comparison |
Centric Consulting FAQ
What is Centric Consulting?
Ohio-based remote-first consultancy helping mid-size US firms set AI usage rules
How much does Centric Consulting charge?
Pricing model: consulting fees; rates not published. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Centric Consulting use?
Centric Consulting works with Azure, Microsoft Copilot. Primary industries served include Insurance, Healthcare, Financial services, Manufacturing.
Is Centric Consulting right for enterprise?
Best for: mid-size US firms writing AI usage policies. Team size: ~1,400. Key consideration: Little EU regulatory work.
What are the best Centric Consulting alternatives?
The best alternatives to Centric Consulting depend on your use case. Top options are:
- KPMG: governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system
- Tensorway: two-interview method per use case, a written drop list, and a roadmap another vendor can implement
- PwC: EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program
Compare Centric Consulting with other AI Advisory firms
Centric Consulting vs KPMG Centric Consulting vs Tensorway Centric Consulting vs PwC Centric Consulting vs appliedAI Centric Consulting vs Deloitte Centric Consulting vs Trilateral Research Centric Consulting vs EY Centric Consulting vs DAIN Studios Centric Consulting vs Artefact Centric Consulting vs Gartner Centric Consulting vs TÜV SÜD Centric Consulting vs BABL AI Centric Consulting vs Sia Partners Centric Consulting vs BearingPoint Centric Consulting vs PA Consulting Centric Consulting vs Zühlke Centric Consulting vs ML6 Centric Consulting vs Eticas Centric Consulting vs Advai Centric Consulting vs Futurice Centric Consulting vs Knowit Centric Consulting vs Saidot Centric Consulting vs West Monroe Centric Consulting vs Elder Research Centric Consulting vs Ekimetrics Centric Consulting vs Slalom Centric Consulting vs Thoughtworks Centric Consulting vs RTS Labs Centric Consulting vs Future Processing
Verify all details directly with Centric Consulting before making a decision.