Slalom
Seattle consultancy with local offices and an AI governance practice
Founded 2001 | Seattle, USA | 10,000+ employees
ai-strategyai-governanceimplementation-supportchange-management
What is Slalom?
Slalom has more than 10,000 employees in over 50 offices and was founded in Seattle in 2001. Its AI and data strategists work on governance and operating models, and a new chief AI officer arrived in August 2026. Close ties with the major cloud and data vendors mean its advice usually points toward those platforms.
Slalom works primarily with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Local-office consultants for AI governance and operating models.
Slalom tech stack and services
AWSAzureGoogle CloudSnowflake
| Service area |
|---|
| AI Strategy & Roadmap |
| AI Governance |
| Implementation After Advice |
| Change Management |
Slalom pricing
Short answer: Slalom prices its work as follows: consulting fees; rates not published. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-use-case advisory | Quoted per scope | Several use cases, teams, or systems |
| Delivery team | Team rate; see pricing model above | Building what the advice recommends |
Slalom does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Slalom pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Local teams for on-site work | -Advice leans toward its partner platforms |
| +Governance and operating-model experience | -Limited EU regulatory depth |
| +Can build afterward | -New AI leadership still settling in |
Slalom vs alternatives
How Slalom compares to the other top AI Advisory firms.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPMG | Regulated firms needing audit-grade AI governance. | Governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | COOs and CFOs wanting a vendor-neutral AI plan. | Two-interview method per use case, a written drop list, and a roadmap another vendor can implement | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| PwC | Multinationals mapping AI Act duties with other EU... | EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| appliedAI | German industrial firms seeking neutral AI guidance. | Advice from a German AI ecosystem with a non-profit institute focused on AI Act practice | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Deloitte | Large regulated groups needing documented AI controls. | Regulatory and audit teams beside the AI advisers, with global reach | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Trilateral Research | Public bodies needing rights and ethics assessments. | Fundamental rights and ethics impact assessments from a research-led firm | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| EY | Enterprises building AI risk into existing controls. | AI risk work folded into existing technology risk and controls programs | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| DAIN Studios | Nordic and DACH firms wanting governance they own. | Governance and readiness work designed to be run by the client's own team | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Artefact | Large consumer brands across European markets. | Data governance and AI planning with engineers in the same firm | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Gartner | CIOs and CDOs choosing AI vendors. | Analyst advice on AI vendors and governance with no implementation work to sell | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| TÜV SÜD | Firms wanting an independent AI Act assessment. | Independent testing and certification of AI systems against EU AI Act requirements | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BABL AI | Companies needing an independent third-party AI audit. | Criteria-based third-party AI audits, separate from any design or build work | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Sia Partners | Utilities and insurers wanting regulatory-minded advice. | Sector regulatory practices applied to AI governance, plus its own Heka.ai tools | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| BearingPoint | European banks pairing AI with regulatory reporting. | European consulting with regulatory technology products from the same group | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| PA Consulting | UK public bodies wanting advice plus delivery. | Advice from teams that also design and build, strong in UK government | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Swiss and European health and finance firms. | Partner-owned advisory and engineering for regulated health and finance work | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| ML6 | Benelux firms wanting advice from builders. | Use-case discovery from engineers who also handle EU AI Act requirements | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Eticas | Public bodies auditing deployed algorithms. | Independent algorithmic audits that measure bias and accuracy in real use | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Advai | UK financial firms testing AI before launch. | Technical robustness testing, chosen by the FCA as partner for its AI Live Testing pilot | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Futurice | Nordic firms redesigning services around AI. | AI strategy combined with service design and operating-model work | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Knowit | Nordic public authorities wanting a local partner. | Nordic public-sector reach with data governance and AI under one roof | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Saidot | Teams wanting AI inventory software with setup help. | Governance software for AI inventories and risk tracking, integrated with Azure AI | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| West Monroe | US COOs targeting operating-cost gains. | Operations and cost-led AI advice from a partly employee-owned firm | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Elder Research | US agencies wanting a data feasibility check. | Feasibility calls grounded in three decades of hands-on modeling | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Ekimetrics | CFOs who want AI tied to measured returns. | Return-on-investment measurement for marketing and sustainability AI | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Thoughtworks | CTOs judging build-or-buy on AI tooling. | Public Technology Radar and engineering-led build-or-buy advice | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Centric Consulting | Mid-size US firms writing AI usage policies. | Acceptable-use policies and staff adoption programs for generative AI | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| RTS Labs | Small US firms testing one idea cheaply. | The cheapest entry point here, with feasibility tests in place of strategy decks | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Future Processing | European mid-size firms on a modest budget. | AI readiness checks at published Central European rates | 3.7 | Full comparison |
Slalom FAQ
What is Slalom?
Seattle consultancy with local offices and an AI governance practice
How much does Slalom charge?
Pricing model: consulting fees; rates not published. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Slalom use?
Slalom works with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Snowflake. Primary industries served include Financial services, Healthcare, Retail, Public sector.
Is Slalom right for enterprise?
Best for: north American firms wanting local consultants. Team size: 10,000+. Key consideration: Advice leans toward its partner platforms.
What are the best Slalom alternatives?
The best alternatives to Slalom depend on your use case. Top options are:
- KPMG: governance and assurance depth, backed by its own ISO/IEC 42001-certified AI management system
- Tensorway: two-interview method per use case, a written drop list, and a roadmap another vendor can implement
- PwC: EU AI Act compliance planned alongside DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 in one program
Compare Slalom with other AI Advisory firms
Slalom vs KPMG Slalom vs Tensorway Slalom vs PwC Slalom vs appliedAI Slalom vs Deloitte Slalom vs Trilateral Research Slalom vs EY Slalom vs DAIN Studios Slalom vs Artefact Slalom vs Gartner Slalom vs TÜV SÜD Slalom vs BABL AI Slalom vs Sia Partners Slalom vs BearingPoint Slalom vs PA Consulting Slalom vs Zühlke Slalom vs ML6 Slalom vs Eticas Slalom vs Advai Slalom vs Futurice Slalom vs Knowit Slalom vs Saidot Slalom vs West Monroe Slalom vs Elder Research Slalom vs Ekimetrics Slalom vs Thoughtworks Slalom vs Centric Consulting Slalom vs RTS Labs Slalom vs Future Processing
Verify all details directly with Slalom before making a decision.